I'm a Korean but I think so that Takeshima is Japan territory, After this everything of Takeshima are blong to Japan.
But I've qustion where is Takeshima? in Japan? OK.. I see.. You want to trade between Tsushima to Dogdo or between main Island of Japan to Dogdo right? I will thing about it.
Hey Japan guys.. be a man.
Anyhow you have to stay to your Island no more.. OK?
1.북방 영토와 타케시마는 일본의 영토입니다 1.Japanese island Takeshima is being ILLEGAL-occupied by Korea. 1.竹島(Takeshima)は日本領土です。 *（誤解が解けるまで継続掲示） (오해가 풀릴 때까지 계속 게시)
2.(=ﾟωﾟ=)!! ウチらの竹島から出て行け！それかICJに来い！！ 2.GET OUT OUR TERRITORY or Let's go ICJ wiz JAPAN!!
3.( ﾟДﾟ)ｺﾞﾙｧ！ 竹島は日韓併合前から日本の領土 3.now-TAKESHIMA(Liancourt Rocks) is JAPANESE territory, before Japan/Korea annex.
4.( ノﾟДﾟ)ﾖｯ＝！戦後のGHQ,UNによる処理も竹島は日本領 4.Takeshima was treated as a Japanese territory as for the processing in postwar by GHQ,UN.
5.●韓国人が竹島を統治したり、住んだことは一度も無い。1954年から続く不法占拠を除いては。 5.There is never that Korea governed now-Takeshima,or Korean lived in'.except the [illegal-occupation] continue to rite now, since 1954.
6.★불법 점거를 100년 계속해도 한국령으로는 되지 않습니다！ 6.★TAKESHIMA will NOT become Korea territory, Even if Korea continue the Illegal Occupation for 100years !! 6.★不法占拠を１００年続けても韓国領にはなりません！
우리 영토인 울릉도에서 독도까지의 거리는 48해리인데, 일본 은기도에서는 이 거리의 약 2배인 82해리이다. 따라서 지정학적으로 가까운 우리나라에 포함되어야 한다.
역사적 근거
독도는 신라시대에 울릉도와 더불어 우산국을 형성하였으며, 우산국은 신라 지증왕 13년 (512년) 신라에 귀속하여 왔다. 그 이후 계속 고려와 조선을 거쳐 현재까지도 우리나라의 관리 하에 있다.
일본이 1905년 시마네현 40호 행정조치를 취한 것은 독도가 일본의 고유 영토가 아님을 실증하는 것이다.
국제법상 근거
그 지역이 주인이 없어야 한다.
영역취득의 국가의사가 있고, 그 의사를 대외적으로 공표 하여야 한다.
그 지역의 실효적인 점유가 있어야 한다
카이로 선언
‘포츠담선언’ '카이로선언'을 보면 폭력과 강요에 의해 취득한 모든 영토를 돌려준다는 구절이 있으며, 일본은 포츠담선언을 통해 카이로선언을 전적으로 수용한다는 것을 선언하였으므로 폭력과 강요에 의해 빼앗겼던 독도를 일본은 당연히 포기해야 한다. 당시 일본의 폭력성을 증명하는 대표적 예가 '고종강제퇴위'사건이다. 일본은 1905년 그들의 강요로 체결된 을사조약으로 대한제국의 외교권을 빼앗는다. 이에 대항하여 고종황제가 국가의 자주권회복을 위해 헤이그로 밀사를 파견한자 일본은 이를 빌미로 궁궐밖에 대포를 배치한 채 고종황제를 위협하여 강제 퇴위시켰다
↑"(ﾟДﾟ )ha?"
■. 지정학적 근거 地政学的根拠 = =1.近接性は国際法で領有要素にならない。 The close proximity doesn't become an owning element in International Law.
=2.逆に92kmも離れ、地理的にもつながっていない島は属島とは言わない It parts as much as 92km and the island not connected are NOT called a belonging island geographically.
=3.海底地形も竹島は日本側の大陸棚にある. The topography of the seabed of Takeshima is in the continental shelf in Japan.
<li>
■. 역사적 근거 歴史的な根拠 =1.これが書かれている資料は「三国史記 in 1145」。これに竹島は出てこない。 This document is "三国史記 in 1145. ",Takeshima doesn't come out in this.
=2.「太宗実録 in 1417」には ”大竹、芋、アシカ等を持ち帰ったと書いてあり、于山島には86人が住んでるとあることから于山于が竹島では無いことが証明できる。 "太宗実録 in 1417" It is written that "I took Bigbamboo, the Potato, and the Sea dog, etc.. Moreover, it is written that 86 people live in [Usando]. It can be proven that "Takeshima is NOT Usando."
=3.禁止されそうなアシカ漁のために漁民が許可を求めた→ →県と国で管理を話し合った →島の管理は県で行うことに→ 編入公示（調査の際に他国が支配した形跡が無いことが確認されている） → A fishermen asked for permission for sea dog fishing (in this time, the fishing seems to be prohibited) →Management was talked about with the prefecture and country. →The island will be managed in the prefecture. →Incorporation notification (It is confirmed that there are no signs that another country ruled when investigating).</li>
■. 국제법상 근거 国際法上の根拠 =1.in1952:李承晩ラインは国際法上も違法である。 In1952: The [Lee Shen-man Line] is illegal on International Law. =2.[アメリカ国務省作成注釈書 1950年7月]、[Rusk note of 1951]、[1954年8月15日 report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East] など戦勝国の判定も竹島は日本である。♪日本領土という前提で射爆場として使われた。 Takeshima is Japan in the judgment of the victorious country such as report of [Van Fleet mission to the Far East1954], [Rusk note of 1951], [ 1950 : American Department of State making annotation book]. ♪It was specified for a bomb range by assumption of Japanese territory.
=3.1905年の時点で韓国は日本に抗議していない。 Korea has NOT been protesting against Japan during 1905.
※1.Takeshima is not included in "the Cairo declaration." Besids, owning of Japan has been established as for Takeshima since the at least 1600's before that. It is NOT an island obtained by violence and compulsion. ★【Japan/Korea annexation】 requested by KOREA.
Korea was immediately before the bankruptcy for [minpi] and the civil war. so Korea asked for help.
It is not Russia of communism, but Japan as same Asian country.
The League of Nations also is winning consent. It concluded a pact purposely, approval was gotten,
(IN THIS TIME, the invasion and made colony was LAWFUL in International Law) BUT,,,,,
Japan paid Debt of Korea!! . ,
the woman and the slave were liberated,
the name was given,
Hangul was taught(made is 世宗/세종) ,
the farmland was made,
the technology was taught,
and Japan established the school !
[Korea was protected by Japanese merger.NOT invading. Korea was NOT colony. It's a dependence / guarded domain.]
※2.Ulleungdo-event 1694, Korea insisted "Ulleungdo is Korea" use the word written in 『東国輿地勝覧』 words "It is [Ulleungdo] that had been seen from a Korean mainland" but,,, After 1950,* Korea insisted "[Takeshima] that had been seen from [Ulleungdo]"* on the SAME part. It self-contradicts.
Comments
LEE,Korea, on November 26, 2008, said:
Where are Takeshima? Takeshima was nonexistent place.... This is Korean Territory TokDo..
takeshima.jp, on November 27, 2008, said:
닥쳐! 거지 민족
김성동, on January 31, 2009, said:
누가 누구보고 거지 민족이라고 지랄이냐? 진정한 거지민족은 너희 일본이다. 미친 너희 일본왕을 믿고 날뛰는 너희 미친 민족말이다.
takeshima.jp, on February 3, 2009, said:
진실의 역사를 모르는 가엾은乞食한국인
김성동, on February 3, 2009, said:
내 생각에는 너희들이 더 가없어 보이는데 미친 천황이 너희들을 쇄뇌시키니까 말이야
Equinox of Korea, on February 7, 2009, said:
지금즉시 입다물기 바란다. Monkey倭狄.
tykim0709, on February 14, 2009, said:
takeshima.jp 니가 더 거지 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋ 빙신
Thuny Kim, on March 3, 2009, said:
I'm a Korean but I think so that Takeshima is Japan territory, After this everything of Takeshima are blong to Japan.
But I've qustion where is Takeshima? in Japan? OK.. I see.. You want to trade between Tsushima to Dogdo or between main Island of Japan to Dogdo right? I will thing about it.
Hey Japan guys.. be a man.
Anyhow you have to stay to your Island no more.. OK?
김종성, on April 6, 2009, said:
일본놈들은 태평양에 풍덩 시켜버려 저게 감히 우리말을 배워가지고 말야 늙으면 태평양에 빠져 죽을걸 왜 사니
jdhhssldd, on May 12, 2009, said:
Japanese territory 日本国固有領土 일본 영토
손경빈, on July 6, said:
이런 사진 왜 올리니?
sisonori999, on July 6, said:
2.(=ﾟωﾟ=)!! ウチらの竹島から出て行け！それかICJに来い！！ 2.GET OUT OUR TERRITORY or Let's go ICJ wiz JAPAN!!
3.( ﾟДﾟ)ｺﾞﾙｧ！ 竹島は日韓併合前から日本の領土 3.now-TAKESHIMA(Liancourt Rocks) is JAPANESE territory, before Japan/Korea annex.
4.( ノﾟДﾟ)ﾖｯ＝！戦後のGHQ,UNによる処理も竹島は日本領 4.Takeshima was treated as a Japanese territory as for the processing in postwar by GHQ,UN.
5.●韓国人が竹島を統治したり、住んだことは一度も無い。1954年から続く不法占拠を除いては。 5.There is never that Korea governed now-Takeshima,or Korean lived in'.except the [illegal-occupation] continue to rite now, since 1954.
6.★불법 점거를 100년 계속해도 한국령으로는 되지 않습니다！ 6.★TAKESHIMA will NOT become Korea territory, Even if Korea continue the Illegal Occupation for 100years !! 6.★不法占拠を１００年続けても韓国領にはなりません！
이성동, on September 12, said:
독도가 우리나라 땅인 이유
지정학적 근거
우리 영토인 울릉도에서 독도까지의 거리는 48해리인데, 일본 은기도에서는 이 거리의 약 2배인 82해리이다. 따라서 지정학적으로 가까운 우리나라에 포함되어야 한다.
역사적 근거
일본이 1905년 시마네현 40호 행정조치를 취한 것은 독도가 일본의 고유 영토가 아님을 실증하는 것이다.
국제법상 근거
그 지역이 주인이 없어야 한다.
그 지역의 실효적인 점유가 있어야 한다
카이로 선언
‘포츠담선언’ '카이로선언'을 보면 폭력과 강요에 의해 취득한 모든 영토를 돌려준다는 구절이 있으며, 일본은 포츠담선언을 통해 카이로선언을 전적으로 수용한다는 것을 선언하였으므로 폭력과 강요에 의해 빼앗겼던 독도를 일본은 당연히 포기해야 한다. 당시 일본의 폭력성을 증명하는 대표적 예가 '고종강제퇴위'사건이다. 일본은 1905년 그들의 강요로 체결된 을사조약으로 대한제국의 외교권을 빼앗는다. 이에 대항하여 고종황제가 국가의 자주권회복을 위해 헤이그로 밀사를 파견한자 일본은 이를 빌미로 궁궐밖에 대포를 배치한 채 고종황제를 위협하여 강제 퇴위시켰다
sisonori999, on October 15, said:
↑"(ﾟДﾟ )ha?" ■. 지정학적 근거 地政学的根拠 = =1.近接性は国際法で領有要素にならない。 The close proximity doesn't become an owning element in International Law.
=2.逆に92kmも離れ、地理的にもつながっていない島は属島とは言わない It parts as much as 92km and the island not connected are NOT called a belonging island geographically.
=3.海底地形も竹島は日本側の大陸棚にある. The topography of the seabed of Takeshima is in the continental shelf in Japan.
<li> ■. 역사적 근거 歴史的な根拠 =1.これが書かれている資料は「三国史記 in 1145」。これに竹島は出てこない。 This document is "三国史記 in 1145. ",Takeshima doesn't come out in this.
=2.「太宗実録 in 1417」には ”大竹、芋、アシカ等を持ち帰ったと書いてあり、于山島には86人が住んでるとあることから于山于が竹島では無いことが証明できる。 "太宗実録 in 1417" It is written that "I took Bigbamboo, the Potato, and the Sea dog, etc.. Moreover, it is written that 86 people live in [Usando]. It can be proven that "Takeshima is NOT Usando."
=3.禁止されそうなアシカ漁のために漁民が許可を求めた→ →県と国で管理を話し合った →島の管理は県で行うことに→ 編入公示（調査の際に他国が支配した形跡が無いことが確認されている） → A fishermen asked for permission for sea dog fishing (in this time, the fishing seems to be prohibited) →Management was talked about with the prefecture and country. →The island will be managed in the prefecture. →Incorporation notification (It is confirmed that there are no signs that another country ruled when investigating).</li>
■. 국제법상 근거 国際法上の根拠 =1.in1952:李承晩ラインは国際法上も違法である。 In1952: The [Lee Shen-man Line] is illegal on International Law. =2.[アメリカ国務省作成注釈書 1950年7月]、[Rusk note of 1951]、[1954年8月15日 report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East] など戦勝国の判定も竹島は日本である。♪日本領土という前提で射爆場として使われた。 Takeshima is Japan in the judgment of the victorious country such as report of [Van Fleet mission to the Far East1954], [Rusk note of 1951], [ 1950 : American Department of State making annotation book]. ♪It was specified for a bomb range by assumption of Japanese territory.
=3.1905年の時点で韓国は日本に抗議していない。 Korea has NOT been protesting against Japan during 1905.
※카이로 선언 カイロ宣言 カイロ宣言に竹島は含まれない。 それ以前に竹島は少なくとも1600年代から日本の領有が確立されている。 暴力と強制によって得た島ではない。 ★【日韓併合】は借金と内戦に苦しむ韓国の要請があって行われた。国際連盟にも同意を得ている。 当時の国際法では植民地侵略は合法だったが、日本はわざわざ条約を締結し、承認をもらい、借金を肩代わりし、女性と奴隷を解放し、名前を与え、ハングルを教え、農地を作り、技術を教え学校を作った。
※2.1694年、鬱陵島問題の時には、『東国輿地勝覧』に書かれた言葉は「朝鮮本土から見た鬱稜島である」と主張した。 1950年以降、韓国は同じ部分を「鬱稜島から見た竹島」と主張した。自己矛盾している。
※1.Takeshima is not included in "the Cairo declaration." Besids, owning of Japan has been established as for Takeshima since the at least 1600's before that. It is NOT an island obtained by violence and compulsion. ★【Japan/Korea annexation】 requested by KOREA. Korea was immediately before the bankruptcy for [minpi] and the civil war. so Korea asked for help. It is not Russia of communism, but Japan as same Asian country. The League of Nations also is winning consent. It concluded a pact purposely, approval was gotten, (IN THIS TIME, the invasion and made colony was LAWFUL in International Law) BUT,,,,, Japan paid Debt of Korea!! . , the woman and the slave were liberated, the name was given, Hangul was taught(made is 世宗/세종) , the farmland was made, the technology was taught, and Japan established the school ! [Korea was protected by Japanese merger.NOT invading. Korea was NOT colony. It's a dependence / guarded domain.]
※2.Ulleungdo-event 1694, Korea insisted "Ulleungdo is Korea" use the word written in 『東国輿地勝覧』 words "It is [Ulleungdo] that had been seen from a Korean mainland" but,,, After 1950,* Korea insisted "[Takeshima] that had been seen from [Ulleungdo]"* on the SAME part. It self-contradicts.
WAKE UP KOREAN!! 알았는가? 한국인! 너들이 받은 교육은 날조다!
SoODaL, on November 11, said:
쌉치고 발닦고 자라 씹년들아 대가리에 칼빵놓기전에
korea park-gyung-tea, on December 13, said:
어디서 남의 땅을 떼어먹으려고 우리나라가 나라같지않냐 우리나라 점령하고 나서 할 짓이 없던??? dok-do is korea territory forever!!!!!!!!!!!