Landing near Dusseldorf

Mick Flynn, on May 2, 2007, said:

Hi Libor, just looking at your 3d's. This one is very effective.

viewlife (Geravelis …, on August 17, 2007, said:

very good pictures, but i can't anderstant what i'm looking to, i can't see the diference between the two pictures, where is the diferent, and 3D?

LiborM.net, on August 22, 2007, said:

They are different ;-) Look at this forum thread.

Jessica G., on August 23, 2007, said:

Hi LiborM, your 3D pictures are excellent. I've taken a couple of aerial ones as well, and it's sure hard! Planes move so fast you can't get two clear pictures of the same area from a close enough shift distance. You've managed it somehow, though. Good job!!!

Jessica

LiborM.net, on August 25, 2007, said:

Hi Jessica. I used continuous shooting of my digital camera, it takes almost 3 pictures per second. Resulting distance of taken pictures are more than eyes distance, but 3D still works.

Jessica G., on August 25, 2007, said:

That makes sense. For a distant landscape like an aerial, eye distance wouldn't be enough to make a 3D effect. I'll have to work on the continuous shooting in a plane - I've tried it, but all the pictures after the first come out blurry. The way I do it I take two separate pictures, with focussing time between, and by then it's often too far. Thanks for the advice.