This is how your name and profile photo will appear on Panoramio if you connect this Google+ account.
You cannot switch to a different account later.
Learn more.
Annick, Im really sorry for terribly delayed response. I remember I wanted to check some facts before answering your question and than completely forgot about it. I only found it today while browsing through old comments. My appologies.
This is just one example of what I would call communist legacy. In late 1940s and 1950s communist "nationalized" property of many people, mainly land, but often - in case of rich families or bourgeoisie - also houses and other property. This property was used for "nation's ends": land for crops, houses for orphanages, etc. Basically, most of "nationalized" property was vastly damaged in 1989, when communism fell.
During 1990s former owners could get their (damaged) property back, but could not effort to renew it. In some cases owners were either dead or fled the country and were not willing to come back. This is probably one of such cases.
Comments (2)
Hi Juraj what happened in this village? just abandonned? Cheers Annick
Annick, Im really sorry for terribly delayed response. I remember I wanted to check some facts before answering your question and than completely forgot about it. I only found it today while browsing through old comments. My appologies.
This is just one example of what I would call communist legacy. In late 1940s and 1950s communist "nationalized" property of many people, mainly land, but often - in case of rich families or bourgeoisie - also houses and other property. This property was used for "nation's ends": land for crops, houses for orphanages, etc. Basically, most of "nationalized" property was vastly damaged in 1989, when communism fell. During 1990s former owners could get their (damaged) property back, but could not effort to renew it. In some cases owners were either dead or fled the country and were not willing to come back. This is probably one of such cases.