11773264
appears (less than 1 km, but) clearly MIS-placed,
at 28° 6' 5.72" N 17° 12' 32.82" W
--despite suggested correction(s), detailed explanations and numerous pleas for correction--
as may easily be verified by a brief look on GoogleEarth-Map, or
25412589, or compare
this 3-foto-montage
which was taken from near where 11773264 is MIS-placed now.
As author HEBRARD most persistently refuses to correct position and keeps
deleting explanations+pleas for correction instead,
comments are now archived with 25412589.
Comments
wda, on August 9, said:
11773264 appears (less than 1 km, but) clearly MIS-placed, at 28° 6' 5.72" N 17° 12' 32.82" W --despite suggested correction(s), detailed explanations and numerous pleas for correction-- as may easily be verified by a brief look on GoogleEarth-Map, or 25412589, or compare this 3-foto-montage which was taken from near where 11773264 is MIS-placed now.
As author HEBRARD most persistently refuses to correct position and keeps deleting explanations+pleas for correction instead, comments are now archived with 25412589.