In this scene you have to do the opposite of crossing your eyes. You have to relax them to the point that the images meet in the center. It is much more difficult to view this kind of 3D image without the aid of some form of device. I was able to do it, but only on the small image and only after a little time and concentration.
I was also able to see the image merge into a 3d.
You actually end up seeing 3 images of the same. The middle image appears 3d.
Are these photos taken from two separate positions to cause a stereo image?
Hi klangheld, it seems my friend Wei is occupied and unable answer your question. The answer to your is yes. It is hard to believe, but yes it is that simple.
You can learn more about this technique from our discussion. Best wishes from Izmir
Comments
Vasco Pires, on July 5, 2007, said:
This is great also. And again on P-3D
©galilaeus, on July 21, 2008, said:
Hi Wei, I'm able to see X-3D crossing my eyes, but P-3D is still a mistery for me! Can you teach me how to see P-3D? Thanks and CIAO dall'Italia
Raligard, on November 15, 2008, said:
In this scene you have to do the opposite of crossing your eyes. You have to relax them to the point that the images meet in the center. It is much more difficult to view this kind of 3D image without the aid of some form of device. I was able to do it, but only on the small image and only after a little time and concentration.
klangheld, on December 16, 2008, said:
I was also able to see the image merge into a 3d. You actually end up seeing 3 images of the same. The middle image appears 3d. Are these photos taken from two separate positions to cause a stereo image?
Volkan YUKSEL, on December 29, 2008, said:
Hi klangheld, it seems my friend Wei is occupied and unable answer your question. The answer to your is yes. It is hard to believe, but yes it is that simple.
You can learn more about this technique from our discussion. Best wishes from Izmir