Apart from the minor typo (should be Epilobium) this brings out another of those 'common name' issues. To Australians, fireweeds refers to the herbaceous Senecio species (Asteraceae), and in particular S. madagascariensis, an exotic weed considered toxic to stock.
However, I am jealous. This is a gorgeous shot. Our Epilobium species in the Antipodes are much smaller than this, which looks like it's rivalling Oenothera in size.
(Off into the field again today - two in a row, and then tomorrow too! Yippee!!!)
The individual flowers are only 1 to 2cm in size. However, the plant may have a raceme of 30 or more flowers. Here is a little more info.
I have also heard of Kochia scoparia referred to as "fireweed", due to it's red fall color. However, kochia is a noxious weed throughout much of the US.
By the way, I lied when I said we only had about 15 families. I sat down and started listing all the ones I knew we had represented here. We actually have over 30 families in this county, and somewhere in the neighborhood of 700 species. It gets more diverse in areas with higher precip. Not much compared to you, I know, but more than I was thinking.
No, you didn't lie, because you said most of the plants fall into about 12 families. That was part of the reason I gave our largest families a go.
Not knowing the size of your county I can't really compare, but yes, we do have an extraordinary diversity of plants in this part of the world, with somewhere in the vicinity of 1700 spp in an area of 50,000 sq. km in the Border Rivers CMA (the area I cover).
Do you find (as I have) that poorer soils tend to be more diverse? Around Sydney the sandstone country (quartz-rich, virtually nutrient-free soils) have enormous diversity.
Greg, it depends on what you mean by poor. As you say, something like granitic soils, that are basically just a pile of coarse sands are quite diverse, as long as precip isn't too lacking. It's sort of a blank template, I guess. Since they aren't chemically limited in any way, I tend to think of them as good soils. We tend to have high pH soils (over 8 is normal), but what I think of as really poor soils in this area are the saline and sodic soils which are virtually bare.
Poor is virtually nutrient-free, quartzose sandstone like the Hawkesbury Sandstone near Sydney. Soils are typically podzolics, with a strongly leached A horizon. The pH is usually under 5. I agree, granites aren't that poor.
Beautiful fireweed. Just added some flower pics in my page. Any help/correction will be welcomed!
Raynald, your flower photos are lovely. However, for help with identification, I'd ask Greg S.. He's a real botanist, and a veritable encyclopedia...
You listening, Greg?? :)
Is listening the right verb to use?!
Thanks for the plug. As to the soil info, the knowledge I have is a lot older than that of any of our 'dirt-doctors', so maybe our system has been replaced too (I did hear comments of such...)
Well, it is supposed to be a 'conversation', right?
True! ;) Had a bit of a look at Raynald's pictures. Only a few I could give good names for though.
The names were very good indeed! at least as far as I can say after running google image on them! (my knowledge is THAT bad!!!).
Thanks a lot!
Sign up to comment.
Sign in if you already did it.
Photo taken in Beaverhead County, MT, USA
Misplaced? Suggest new location