Witaj Andrzej, jestem zaszczycony i dziękuję za to wyróżnienie! Co do regulaminu to już się tłumaczyłem pod innym zdjęciem, pod którym zwróciłeś mi uwagę - niestety nie przeczytałem wówczas regulaminu, ale już go znam i z pewnością będę przestrzegał. Serdecznie pozdrawiam.
Look, I'm not dening anything happened in 47-8', including some brutal things Israeli soldiers (if you can call them like that, because they were not soldiers, and Israel has'nt established yet) did. but again, the situation of these times was of life or death. and those kind of acts are nothing, comparing the arabs' attacks. the fact that we won is not making us guilty. the things that would have happened to the jews if the arabs had won, could be much worse then that.
I did'nt read Morris, but here some of the opinions of your beloved historian:
"I always doubted the intentions of the Palestinians. The events of Camp David and what followed in their wake turned the doubt into certainty. When the Palestinians rejected the proposal of [prime minister Ehud] Barak in July 2000 and the Clinton proposal in December 2000, I understood that they are unwilling to accept the two-state solution. They want it all. Lod and Acre and Jaffa"
"When a Haaretz interviewer called the 1948 Palestinian exodus "ethnic cleansing," Morris responded that "[t]here are circumstances in history that justify ethnic cleansing. I know that this term is completely negative in the discourse of the 21st century, but when the choice is between ethnic cleansing and genocide—the annihilation of your people—I prefer ethnic cleansing."
so, I'm not supporting ethnic cleaning yet, but if the choice is between "ilegal occupation" and the annihilation of my country - I prefer the first one.
It's very relevent. attacks on Israel have happened all the time, no matter when or what was the excuse. how you explain missile attacks from Lebanon? it's a legal border even by international law. the people shooting missiles from there have the same idiology as those in gaza and in the west bank. Israel cannot give up on this territories as long these kind of organizations have power, ability and will.
the Israelis and the palestaines that injured while protesting, because they made disorder and try to hit the police and army. protesters are not being shot for fun.
And as I said before, International law is a very nice thing, but, again, you cannot expect Israel follow it as long as its enemies violate it repeatedly. Who will guarantee Israel's security and existence? I tell you - no one.
Loading…
MRR's conversations
The Nativity Chusrch is in Palestine, not in Israel. Please, change the location.
more »
Witaj Andrzej, jestem zaszczycony i dziękuję za to wyróżnienie! Co do regulaminu to już się tłumaczyłem pod innym zdjęciem, pod którym zwróciłeś mi uwagę - niestety nie przeczytałem wówczas regulaminu, ale już go znam i z pewnością będę przestrzegał. Serdecznie pozdrawiam.
more »
It was used as prison at the time of the israeli presence in this part of Palestine...
more »
Look, I'm not dening anything happened in 47-8', including some brutal things Israeli soldiers (if you can call them like that, because they were not soldiers, and Israel has'nt established yet) did. but again, the situation of these times was of life or death. and those kind of acts are nothing, comparing the arabs' attacks. the fact that we won is not making us guilty. the things that would have happened to the jews if the arabs had won, could be much worse then that. I did'nt read Morris, but here some of the opinions of your beloved historian:
"I always doubted the intentions of the Palestinians. The events of Camp David and what followed in their wake turned the doubt into certainty. When the Palestinians rejected the proposal of [prime minister Ehud] Barak in July 2000 and the Clinton proposal in December 2000, I understood that they are unwilling to accept the two-state solution. They want it all. Lod and Acre and Jaffa"
"When a Haaretz interviewer called the 1948 Palestinian exodus "ethnic cleansing," Morris responded that "[t]here are circumstances in history that justify ethnic cleansing. I know that this term is completely negative in the discourse of the 21st century, but when the choice is between ethnic cleansing and genocide—the annihilation of your people—I prefer ethnic cleansing."
so, I'm not supporting ethnic cleaning yet, but if the choice is between "ilegal occupation" and the annihilation of my country - I prefer the first one.
more »
It's very relevent. attacks on Israel have happened all the time, no matter when or what was the excuse. how you explain missile attacks from Lebanon? it's a legal border even by international law. the people shooting missiles from there have the same idiology as those in gaza and in the west bank. Israel cannot give up on this territories as long these kind of organizations have power, ability and will. the Israelis and the palestaines that injured while protesting, because they made disorder and try to hit the police and army. protesters are not being shot for fun. And as I said before, International law is a very nice thing, but, again, you cannot expect Israel follow it as long as its enemies violate it repeatedly. Who will guarantee Israel's security and existence? I tell you - no one.
more »
ha ha ha ! Ateret as ALL israeli colonies in West Bank is illegal. This is international law. Don't take zionist fantasies for facts ...
more »
exactly ... they would like to hide the crime but here it is ...
more »
Looks like real friendship! Liked
more »
Golan you should learn to read, its written just above ...
more »
erased buildings = empty place to build ... that is exaclty the israeli policies against palestinians in fact, you should buy a brain
more »