Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your questions that make me see how much the communist China covered and sent twisted information about China to this realistic world.
I simply now answer you again about your most interested issue of Korea, Tibet, Vietnam.
First of all, I must ask you where you found the "LOGIC" behind considering Vietnam or Tibet as a part of China and not Korea. I have never known PRC or ROC considering Vietnam is a part of China so far.
Second, where did you find the logic that Tibet is a part of India? Why should India take Tibet as a part of India? Do you know why the communist China attacked India in 1962?
As you asked as following:
I still don’t understand what is the logic behind considering Vietnam or Tibet as a part of China and not Korea. Is it based on the opinion of Dr Sun Yat-sen or others? On History, on political relations, treaties? Please clarify.
Answer:
Historical part:
"Korea and Vietnam were kingdoms. Unfortunately, Tibet was a part of China until India insisted that Tibet was of India. Even the British, they just dared to separate Tibet people during China having a democratic revolution war. For thousand years, Chinese peoples and cultures live there and forming their own cultures. It is like India also having different dialects. If you compare with the pronunciations of Chinese dialects, you may find historical links between them. Even Japanese, you may find links. Or even, you can easily see how different between Indian people and Chinese peoples including Tibetan by your eyes. These cannot cheat."
Political relations:
“Historically, Tibet was a part of China territory. Politically, China officers governed the whole Tibet area before the British came into Tibet. China is not like Indian kingdom system. Indian was ruled by a white man tribe from Europe, and spreads out a kind of religion and system to unite the very different kingdoms like Tamil peoples. China dynasties were very powerful and united political organizations. We have a united language and word system since more than 3 thousand years ago. Before this first empire, they had different political and language systems and cultures, which is similar to federal unions. All tribes in China tried to dominate the center power of Chinese culture. After the emperor age, all tribes surround or inside China emperor tries to take the central part of China and claims that their tribe presents itself as China. So does Vietnam. Vietnam was proud of its present as the heritage of Chinese culture while China was taken over by the north tribe of China from time to time. But, Vietnam and Korea was not a part of China territory during the last dynasty of China. Even when the China democracy won the Second World War, Vietnam remains an independent country. The French people gave up ruling Vietnam. And, the last dynasty admitted China lost Vietnam because of a war between China and France. But, the case of Tibet is different, the British took Tibet was not formally admitted by the last dynasty of China. It was not confirmed by our democracy and was a stolen territory from China by the British. That was a part of reasonable reasons that why the British helped Japan to block our transportation work during the resistant war to Japanese invading in the beginning of the Second World War. Emperors at that time are ambitious and selfish as I observe. Therefore, as the British gave up her ruling over Tibet, it does not make any sense that India should take Tibet as a part of India again. A nation should not be an emperor. Vietnam and Korea was taken by the French, and Japan. While Japan occupying Korea and Vietnam, Korea king asked for help from China. But, Tibet was not like Korea and Japan. In fact, Tibet indeed was and should be a part of China. South Tibet, Myanmar, Thailand were stolen by the British, and the British is gone. Why should India still keep Southern Tibet, and separate their people there?”
These are my answers to your questions as above.
As to Kinmen and Matsu of our democracy, those two islands are never a part of the communist China. That’s different case to Tibet and India. The communist tried to terminate China democracy, but failed. We won battles on our own lands including Kinmen and Matsu. Why should R.O.C. return them to the communist China? That is the communist China shall return the mainland of China back to R.O.C if she can. Hopefully, I wish you could read and think about the thoughts and historical evidences at that time again. You shall see how much the great man “Gandhi” had done for India. China democracy had struggled and paid tremendous price to earn the freedom of Chinese people from the oppression of emperors. But, our China democracy still failed and struggling in a small island now. How lucky India can be democratic with the most parts of India. But, Tibet is not the land of India. The independence of Muslim Pakistan is because of the freedom of religions, nothing is perfect as you suppose though.
There is only my point of views and imagination as below:
As we see in a total democratic society, India, China, and most of the third world countries are overacted in nationalism because of the oppressed situation and educated ways. People put too much stress on having a bigger and stronger nation instead of truth and real happiness of all human beings. A nationalist murdered a saint, Gandhi, and still was proud of his murdering. That’s a nationalist. What’s democracy? Democracy is to have men human rights, free wills, communication ways, peace, and happiness. Why China attacked India? India does not want to give up what the British left. I agree with you that if India resists the spreading of the communist. But, India took the wrong mountains. There were still high mountains along the bottom of the south Tibet. That’s the original boundary of India before the British came to make Indian be slaves. Mentally, Indian people reasonably shall revenge after India got industrialized and strong someday. The British also knows it. Do you know why Mongolians spoke Russian and Russian troops were there? The emperors separated a big country like India or China, they torn their peoples into small pieces first. The first industrialized country was the British, so the British got a powerful weapon to be a great emperor first. And then, the western European countries including France, tried to expand themselves. And, Germany joined the wars of resources. Robbing and revenge comes. Two times of world war happened. And, the Soviet Russian came up with industrialization and a kind of ruling way to cover her emperor. Russia is big, so its power of industrialization is big of course. The communist ideologies starts fires and democratic unions put out fires. They are also afraid of the industrialization of tremendous India and China. And, poor peoples are fooled around by unpractical dreams of nationalism now and communism before. And then, the communist way was testified as a tragic joke. But, the emperor leftover remains. It has formed China and India to eager for the next steps of being greater emperors after a total industrialized future. China and India are waiting behind Russia, Japan, Germany, and the British. The father of Chinese democracy, Dr. Sun Yat Sen’s ideal is to build a peaceful country without wars and boundaries between the people. That’s not the Russian’s emperor way of communist. It’s not to force anyone to be a nationalist. Dr. Sun’s first job was a doctor curing the disease of the poor people. He believes that the power of human evolution is from helping to each other and love. That’s the same to the essence of Gandhi’s deeds. Only LOVE can sacrifice oneself and bring happiness to all others. The separation of Tibet, Pakistan, or my lovely India or China is temporal. As time goes by, God will judge. People must get to know more about each other and learn more about love. We must help each other to survive on this tough environment, Earth. This world eventually will be into a one big family. Nations shall be a meaningless thing on earth. Revenge only brings revenge. God knows if He must stop us from killing each other with a final judge. We are all the same. Just do a warm and right thing before we can!
Loading...
lqf's conversations
别人可以骂共产党...你骂共产党确实昧着良心哦...
more »
歷史的印記，時光的飛逝往往讓人有滄海桑田之感...。
more »
很有歷史紀念價值!
more »
Dear Matodurga,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your questions that make me see how much the communist China covered and sent twisted information about China to this realistic world.
I simply now answer you again about your most interested issue of Korea, Tibet, Vietnam.
First of all, I must ask you where you found the "LOGIC" behind considering Vietnam or Tibet as a part of China and not Korea. I have never known PRC or ROC considering Vietnam is a part of China so far.
Second, where did you find the logic that Tibet is a part of India? Why should India take Tibet as a part of India? Do you know why the communist China attacked India in 1962? As you asked as following: I still don’t understand what is the logic behind considering Vietnam or Tibet as a part of China and not Korea. Is it based on the opinion of Dr Sun Yat-sen or others? On History, on political relations, treaties? Please clarify. Answer: Historical part: "Korea and Vietnam were kingdoms. Unfortunately, Tibet was a part of China until India insisted that Tibet was of India. Even the British, they just dared to separate Tibet people during China having a democratic revolution war. For thousand years, Chinese peoples and cultures live there and forming their own cultures. It is like India also having different dialects. If you compare with the pronunciations of Chinese dialects, you may find historical links between them. Even Japanese, you may find links. Or even, you can easily see how different between Indian people and Chinese peoples including Tibetan by your eyes. These cannot cheat."
Political relations: “Historically, Tibet was a part of China territory. Politically, China officers governed the whole Tibet area before the British came into Tibet. China is not like Indian kingdom system. Indian was ruled by a white man tribe from Europe, and spreads out a kind of religion and system to unite the very different kingdoms like Tamil peoples. China dynasties were very powerful and united political organizations. We have a united language and word system since more than 3 thousand years ago. Before this first empire, they had different political and language systems and cultures, which is similar to federal unions. All tribes in China tried to dominate the center power of Chinese culture. After the emperor age, all tribes surround or inside China emperor tries to take the central part of China and claims that their tribe presents itself as China. So does Vietnam. Vietnam was proud of its present as the heritage of Chinese culture while China was taken over by the north tribe of China from time to time. But, Vietnam and Korea was not a part of China territory during the last dynasty of China. Even when the China democracy won the Second World War, Vietnam remains an independent country. The French people gave up ruling Vietnam. And, the last dynasty admitted China lost Vietnam because of a war between China and France. But, the case of Tibet is different, the British took Tibet was not formally admitted by the last dynasty of China. It was not confirmed by our democracy and was a stolen territory from China by the British. That was a part of reasonable reasons that why the British helped Japan to block our transportation work during the resistant war to Japanese invading in the beginning of the Second World War. Emperors at that time are ambitious and selfish as I observe. Therefore, as the British gave up her ruling over Tibet, it does not make any sense that India should take Tibet as a part of India again. A nation should not be an emperor. Vietnam and Korea was taken by the French, and Japan. While Japan occupying Korea and Vietnam, Korea king asked for help from China. But, Tibet was not like Korea and Japan. In fact, Tibet indeed was and should be a part of China. South Tibet, Myanmar, Thailand were stolen by the British, and the British is gone. Why should India still keep Southern Tibet, and separate their people there?”
These are my answers to your questions as above.
As to Kinmen and Matsu of our democracy, those two islands are never a part of the communist China. That’s different case to Tibet and India. The communist tried to terminate China democracy, but failed. We won battles on our own lands including Kinmen and Matsu. Why should R.O.C. return them to the communist China? That is the communist China shall return the mainland of China back to R.O.C if she can. Hopefully, I wish you could read and think about the thoughts and historical evidences at that time again. You shall see how much the great man “Gandhi” had done for India. China democracy had struggled and paid tremendous price to earn the freedom of Chinese people from the oppression of emperors. But, our China democracy still failed and struggling in a small island now. How lucky India can be democratic with the most parts of India. But, Tibet is not the land of India. The independence of Muslim Pakistan is because of the freedom of religions, nothing is perfect as you suppose though. There is only my point of views and imagination as below: As we see in a total democratic society, India, China, and most of the third world countries are overacted in nationalism because of the oppressed situation and educated ways. People put too much stress on having a bigger and stronger nation instead of truth and real happiness of all human beings. A nationalist murdered a saint, Gandhi, and still was proud of his murdering. That’s a nationalist. What’s democracy? Democracy is to have men human rights, free wills, communication ways, peace, and happiness. Why China attacked India? India does not want to give up what the British left. I agree with you that if India resists the spreading of the communist. But, India took the wrong mountains. There were still high mountains along the bottom of the south Tibet. That’s the original boundary of India before the British came to make Indian be slaves. Mentally, Indian people reasonably shall revenge after India got industrialized and strong someday. The British also knows it. Do you know why Mongolians spoke Russian and Russian troops were there? The emperors separated a big country like India or China, they torn their peoples into small pieces first. The first industrialized country was the British, so the British got a powerful weapon to be a great emperor first. And then, the western European countries including France, tried to expand themselves. And, Germany joined the wars of resources. Robbing and revenge comes. Two times of world war happened. And, the Soviet Russian came up with industrialization and a kind of ruling way to cover her emperor. Russia is big, so its power of industrialization is big of course. The communist ideologies starts fires and democratic unions put out fires. They are also afraid of the industrialization of tremendous India and China. And, poor peoples are fooled around by unpractical dreams of nationalism now and communism before. And then, the communist way was testified as a tragic joke. But, the emperor leftover remains. It has formed China and India to eager for the next steps of being greater emperors after a total industrialized future. China and India are waiting behind Russia, Japan, Germany, and the British. The father of Chinese democracy, Dr. Sun Yat Sen’s ideal is to build a peaceful country without wars and boundaries between the people. That’s not the Russian’s emperor way of communist. It’s not to force anyone to be a nationalist. Dr. Sun’s first job was a doctor curing the disease of the poor people. He believes that the power of human evolution is from helping to each other and love. That’s the same to the essence of Gandhi’s deeds. Only LOVE can sacrifice oneself and bring happiness to all others. The separation of Tibet, Pakistan, or my lovely India or China is temporal. As time goes by, God will judge. People must get to know more about each other and learn more about love. We must help each other to survive on this tough environment, Earth. This world eventually will be into a one big family. Nations shall be a meaningless thing on earth. Revenge only brings revenge. God knows if He must stop us from killing each other with a final judge. We are all the same. Just do a warm and right thing before we can!
With LOVE, Warm regards from Taiwan
more »
在隨身碟越做越小的時代，一般人買新隨身碟的理由往往不是舊的用壞了，而是舊的弄丟了。為了應付像小編我這種健忘症和吃了遺失果實的能力者，Pretec之前就推出了名片碟系列，故意用有一整張信用卡大小的「外殼」來安置那小小的隨身碟。這下我會搞丟的就不是隨身碟，而是皮夾了！這次Pretec送測的是和威泰創意合作推出的i-Disk Pocket 8GB，在名片碟上畫了Cathay Creative所授權的圖片。
more »
阿好和友好的摄影，我们可以看到在面对这些人，总是如此的喜悦。
来自西班牙的热情问候。 Josè Mª
more »
星研究：漢族基因南北有別 東西無差 更新日期:2009/11/28 05:02 （中央社記者康世人新加坡27日專電）新加坡科技研究局人類遺傳小組在分析6000份來自新加坡和中國大陸10個省份的基因樣本後，發現漢人的基因南、北有別，存在0.3%的差異，但無東、西的差別。
由劉建軍率領的小組，在分析蒐集的基因樣本後也發現，以廣東省的廣東、潮州和客家族群來說，潮州人的基因更接近中國北方人的基因，客家人的基因則接近中國中間地帶的基因，廣東人則是道地的南方人基因。
新加坡人大多數以福建移民居多，因此方言屬於閩南語，但劉建軍指出，這次蒐集的基因樣本中，並沒有包括福建省，所以缺乏福建人的基因圖譜作為依據，以這次新加坡的樣本和其他省份比較之下，新加坡人分析起來最像廣東的基因圖譜。
劉建軍告訴媒體，這項大型基因研究顯示，中國北方和南方人的基因存在0.3%的細微差異，甚至說不同方言的社群間基因也會有差異，可能是同語系通婚者多的關係。這種差異，和受測者所處的地理位置有一定關聯。
這項研究已刊登在「美國人類遺傳學」雜誌（American Journal of Human Genetics），引起國際的注意。
劉建軍表示，進行這項研究，是因為在研究牛皮癬（psoriasis）、系統性紅斑狼瘡（SLE）、痲瘋病、鼻咽癌和皮膚白斑病（Vitiligo）等疾病蒐集了大量來自中國和新加坡的血液樣本。
這項研究取得的樣本共8200份，但研究小組僅分析其中的6000份，其中來自新加坡的樣本有500多份，其他來自中國最北至遼寧、東至安徽、西至四川，南至廣東的10個省份，也涵蓋了北京和上海。
劉建軍說，由於取得樣本中的DNA有小部份不同，因此小組就研究這個不同的部份，探討來自不同地區的漢人，是否會相似或差異較大，因而根據樣本為不同省份的漢人擬出基因圖譜。
他指出，從基因圖譜上，發現同一省份的樣本會形成一個聚落，不同省份的樣本會佔據不同的位置，從而證明中國南方人和北方人基因有些不同，地理上差距愈遠的方言群，DNA的差距就愈大。
劉建軍表示，這些不同地區的漢族基因圖譜，有助了解祖先遷移和進化的過程，也能幫助小組設計和解釋基因與疾病的關係。981127
more »
印支虎（东南亚虎、中印虎）常年生活在亚洲东南部的热带雨林和亚热带常绿阔叶林中，主要以野猪，水鹿，野牛等动物为食。印支虎常年交配，最为常见是在每年的11月底到第二年4月。雌虎在怀孕103日之后生下幼崽，幼崽在大约18个月后离开母亲独立生活。印支虎的寿命从15-26年不等。印支虎活动范围的具体面积不得而知，但据估计在其栖息地内，虎密度约为4－5头成年虎/100平方公里。 [编辑本段]野生印支虎的分布状况 1998年，据致力于野生虎保护的环保专家彼得·杰克逊的计算，现在约有736–1,225头野生印支虎分布在下列国家： 柬埔寨–150-300 中国 –30-40 缅甸 –106-234 泰国 –250-501 越南 –200 印支虎的虎密度极低，并且它们在各地都遭到了野蛮的偷猎，其中柬埔寨和泰国的印支虎仅在10年间就绝迹了。而据专家说，现在印支虎的数量和1998年相比没有什么大的变化。 2007年，保护国际中国项目宣布，近日在西双版纳国家级自然保护区内的红外监测相机拍下了野生印支虎（Panthera tigris corbetti）的清晰图像。 这表明印支虎目前还生活在中国云南南部自然环境中，这也是全国唯一的野生印支虎活体照片，但就在同一个区域的2009年2月的一天晚上，勐腊县曼纳伞村村委会大臭村的村名康万年将其捕杀，并瓜分其体，所捕杀的印支虎已经到了迟暮之年，这可能是国内发现的唯一一只印支虎已经死了。
more »
ansory,我沒根據的話不敢亂說...不要亂猜了...有本事去跟外國人說理,要回中國的領土與尊嚴...我寫英文信都寫到天亮了
more »
錯當植物人23年 比利時癱瘓者重回世界 更新日期:2009/11/23 14:55 （中央社台北23日綜合外電報導）倫敦「每日郵報」（Daily Mail）今天報導，醫師誤診為植物人的一名比利時男子，23年來其實一直意識清醒。
當時還是學生的胡本（Rom Houben）在一場車禍後，全身癱瘓，而被誤診。
他無法讓專家、家人及朋友知道，其實他可以聽到他們所說的每句話。
現年46歲的胡本說：「我大叫，但是沒有聲音。」
經過一系列全球認證的昏迷檢測後，醫師無奈地宣布胡本已「無意識」。
但3年前，新的高科技掃瞄儀顯示，胡本腦部功能幾乎和正常人一樣。
胡本形容那時有如「重生」。
經過治療，他已能把訊息鍵入電腦螢幕。
拯救胡本的頂尖神經學專家勞瑞斯（StevenLaureys），最近才在期刊上公佈這項案例。
勞瑞斯說：「醫學進步救了他。」他相信世上可能還有許多被誤診的類似病例。
這項發現也可能激起是否有權結束植物人生命的辯論。
胡本一輩子都不太可能離開醫院和電腦，不過他的床頭現在有特殊裝置，讓他可以躺著看書。
胡本說：「我永遠忘不了他們發現我到底出什麼差錯的那天，那是我的重生。」（譯者：中央社陳蓉）981123
more »