This is how your name and profile photo will appear on Panoramio if you connect this Google+ account.
You cannot switch to a different account later.
Learn more.
Здравствуйте! Очень понравилась Ваша фотография, хотелось бы её использовать. Оставьте, пожалуйста, ваш e-mail для сообщения подробностей. Большое спасибо!
What makes the validity of your insist? Why can Dokdo be Japaness territory?
Dokdo is Korean territory.
Japan must return all the Korean territory with Treaty of Peace.
Some of Japaness urges that 'In Treaty of Peace Dokdo was omitted in the list of renowned territory'. It does not right. The treaty described the all the properties Korea had had must be returned. So Japan must return Dokdo.
Some of Japaness urges that Shinema had included Dokdo before the annexation. No, the inclusion was invalid. As everybody knows, They just announced the inclusion, without any pre-notice to owner. The inclusion was based on the wrong insist that Dokdo had naver been recognized and owned by any country. But there are so many evidence those described that Dokdo was Korean territory at the time of inclusion. Even Japaness government published the order of "Dokdo is Korean territory. No access is allowed", in 1877 officially.
Loading…
JEONG, JAE-GEOL's conversations
Где вы были ... Боже упаси!
Здравствуйте! Очень понравилась Ваша фотография, хотелось бы её использовать. Оставьте, пожалуйста, ваш e-mail для сообщения подробностей. Большое спасибо!
un erukto
달이 매우 밝고 기지도 밝네요
nice explosion!
What makes the validity of your insist? Why can Dokdo be Japaness territory?
Dokdo is Korean territory.
Japan must return all the Korean territory with Treaty of Peace.
Some of Japaness urges that 'In Treaty of Peace Dokdo was omitted in the list of renowned territory'. It does not right. The treaty described the all the properties Korea had had must be returned. So Japan must return Dokdo.
Some of Japaness urges that Shinema had included Dokdo before the annexation. No, the inclusion was invalid. As everybody knows, They just announced the inclusion, without any pre-notice to owner. The inclusion was based on the wrong insist that Dokdo had naver been recognized and owned by any country. But there are so many evidence those described that Dokdo was Korean territory at the time of inclusion. Even Japaness government published the order of "Dokdo is Korean territory. No access is allowed", in 1877 officially.
Is there anything wrong?
【不適切な投稿 inappropriate】 この写真は規約に違反している。
車、飛行機、機械などが主要な写真。不可避の場合は例外となります。
クローズアップ：詳細、細部、碑文、信号... テキスト：大きいサイズの著作権表記や広告テキスト、URLなど。それらが小さい表記、あるいはあなたが著作権を有する場合は例外となります。
이른 아침이라 안개 때문에 먼발치 교회(꿈의교회)가 보이지 않네요..
날씨에 따라 분위기가 다르죠.. 반대편 다리 건너는 교회 이미지가 있어 더 신선함을 느끼게 합니다.
어종이 잘못기재 되어 죄송합니다 " 숭어 " 떼 입니다..