Hi Scott, no hard feelings. Perhaps I was a bit hyper-critical, and for that I apologize. I haven't even looked at Pano for a couple of months, and other than the miserable view counts, nothing seems to have changed. So your guess is as good as anyones as to if and when they will discontinue it. I made the switch to G+ and really haven't regretted it so far. Here is the difference for me. I spent nearly 3 years uploading, geo-positioning, tagging, naming, and dealing with the quirky assed Panoramio program itself. My reward . . . less than 2M views for 10,000 images. Today, my view count on G+ is 87,507,274. Google Maps Views keeps a separate and different view count, that one is in excess of 80M. My primary purpose for using Pano in the first place was to give my images public exposure, with the view count being a popularity indicator. Major fail. Try G+, I am sure that you can find multiple communities to post your stuff to, and I'm sure that you will be more than happy with the response will get. Good Luck, Jay
Pano is dead pendejo. Why should I give a rats where I geo locate. I don't even post anymore, and if you would kindly piss off, I won't have to hear about it either.
It's clear, at least to us Portlanders, that you placed this photo where Google told you to place it...not where you took it. The Hung Far Low sign is where the original restaurant WAS, not where the current restaurant is. Just saying.
Well, at least I know where I took the photo, even with my shitty camera...and then at least I care enough to place it correctly on the map. You've placed 10000, I can't comment on the 9990, I only commented on the Portland ones you placed ????.
Quite correct and kudos for knowing the difference. Thanks for taking the time.
So, you decided to place two pix in the wrong place?
C'mon, this façade is downtown in Old Town.
Just too good for VIEWS!!! YSL
Please: TO SAVE PANORAMIO SIGN this PETITION and JOIN this GROUP