Photos by wgryim : on the map, in Google Earth (KML)

この犬は既にキムチ鍋にされましたか？ 私は近いうちに強襲上陸しますよ！

Takeshima, Etrof, Kunasili,Shikotan, Habomai are Japanese islands!! Итуруп、Кунашир、Шикотан、Острова Хабомай　четырех северных островов японской территорией. 타케시마는 일본의 섬입니다.(오해가 풀릴 때까지 계속 게시) 尖閣諸島是日本的領土

TAKESHIMA/LiancourtRocks is JAPANESE territory! 북방 영토와 타케시마는&대마도 일본의 영토입니다 Japanese island Takeshima is being ILLEGAL-occupied by Korea since1954.

◎竹島(Takeshima)は日本領土です。（誤解が解けるまで継続掲示） ◎竹島(Takeshima) is Japanese territory. ◎竹島(Takeshima)타케시마는 일본의 섬입니다. (오해가 풀릴 때까지 계속 게시)

(=ﾟωﾟ=)!!　ウチらの竹島から出て行け！それかICJに来い！！ GET OUT OUR TERRITORY or Let's go ICJ wiz JAPAN!!

( ﾟДﾟ)ｺﾞﾙｧ！　竹島は日韓併合前から日本の領土 now-TAKESHIMA(Liancourt Rocks) is JAPANESE territory, before Japan/Korea annex.

( ノﾟДﾟ)ﾖｯ＝！戦後のGHQ,UNによる処理も竹島は日本領 Takeshima was treated as a Japanese territory as for the processing in postwar by GHQ,UN.

●韓国が竹島を統治したり、韓国人が竹島に住んだことは一度も無い。１９５４年から今まで続く不法占拠を除いては。 There is never that Korea governed now-Takeshima,or Korean lived in'. except the [illegal-occupation] continue to rite now, since 1954.

★ 불법 점거를 100년 계속해도 한국령으로는 되지 않습니다. ★ TAKESHIMA will NOT become Korea territory, Even if Korea continue the Illegal Occupation for　100years. ★ 不法占拠を１００年続けても韓国領にはなりません。

!불법 점거를 계속해도 영원히 한국의 영토로는 되지 않습니다!!!!（何年不法占拠を続けても韓国領にはならん！）

北緯37度15分、東経131度52分 郵便番号685-0000　島根県隠岐郡隠岐の島町　しまねけん、おきぐん、おきのしままち lat. 37° N 15 min, Lng. 131° E 52 min 〒685-0000 Okinoshima-town,Oki-county,Shimane-pref//Japan

韓国は　日本領「対馬&竹島」の領有権を主張するなら「朝鮮半島統一」しろ！ South Korea must unite Korean peninsulas if insist on the dominium of Tsushima and Takeshima.

TAKESHIMA/LiancourtRocks & Tsushima is JAPANESE territory! 북방 영토와 타케시마는&대마도 일본의 영토입니다 한국은 대마도나 타케시마의 영유권을 주장한다면 한반도 통일해라!

世界各地に韓国人が「竹島・対馬は韓国の島だ！」と落書きしています。 中には世界遺産の文化財に傷をつけている例もあります。 もし、ハングルや英語で書かれたそれっぽい落書きを見つけたら迷わず通報、 韓国大使館に抗議して下さい。

Ha, he has come. sisonori was here.

I already fully check about Daijokan order. So we can talk here right now. I must go back to the question before.

I would ask you, (you may have checked Daijokan order, and you can answer to my question. If you have nothing to hide or escape from our debate. Please answer to my question).

Question : You constantly said the island in Daijokan Order was not Dokdo. If Daijokan order confirmed the ownership of Korea for Dokdo at that time, Korea has right to own Dokdo now.

choose one of two below :

1. Do you think so?
2. If not why?

After your answer we can go forward to prove the ownership.

If you have any question to me, I will give you the answer. I have already give you so many answers for your repeated opinion in more than year as you know.

다케시마는 위대한 일본의 영토이다!, 独島は、偉大な日本の領土である, Liancourt Rocks is a territory of grand Japan!! 명박 꺼져!!, 月山明博 消えて！!!!, MB OUT!!!!

타케시마는 일본의 영토.

현재 한국은 무력에 의해 타케시마를 불법 점거하고 있다. 한국이 일방적으로 군사 경계선(Syngman Rhee Line) 을 그어 지금까지 피해를 받은 일본인 억류자는 3,929, 나포된 선박수는 328, 사상자는 44 명을 세었다.

라고 했는데 정말 그랬다면 일본은 참고만 있었겠나?

더 이상 깐죽거리지 말았으면 하는 소망이 있네.

※카이로 선언　カイロ宣言 カイロ宣言に竹島は含まれない。 それ以前に竹島は少なくとも1600年代から日本の領有が確立されている。 暴力と強制によって得た島ではない。 ※1.Takeshima is not included in "the Cairo declaration." Besids, owning of Japan has been established as for Takeshima since the at least 1600's before that. It is not an island obtained by violence and compulsion.

=>★1. 【日韓併合】は借金と内戦に苦しむ韓国の要請があって行われた。国際連盟も同意している。 当時の国際法では植民地侵略は合法。しかし日本はわざわざ条約を締結し、承認をもらい、借金を肩代わりし、女性と奴隷を解放し、名前を与え、ハングルを教え、農地を作り、技術を教え学校を作った =>★【Japan/Korea annexation】 Annexation requested by Korea in which it suffered from economic failure and the civil war and was done. The League of Nations also agrees. The invasion in the colony is lawful in International Law at that time. However, Japan concluded a pact esteeming Korea, and got approval from the L.N. The debt of Korea was subrogated, the woman and the slave were liberated, the name was given, Hangul was taught, the farmland was made, the technology was taught, and the school and the road were built. ~COMPARE with Colonialization of the Euro or U.S. =>★2. 日本国内でも併合反対派が多かったのに、テロリスト安重根が伊藤博文（併合反対派）を卑怯な方法で殺したため併合が早まった。 As for Japan, the Annexation Opposition was abundant. However, annexation has acted rashly because a terrorist "An Jung-geun" killed Hirobumi Ito (annexation opposition) by an unfair method.

★★ハーグ密使事件＝裏切り国家韓国が次の寄生先を探すために密使を送ったが、列強諸国に無視され、背信行為がばれたから使節が自殺した事件。 ★★The Hague event = The envoy committed suicide because it is disregarded by the powers nations, and the foul deed came to light, though the secret messenger was sent so that BETRAYAL-Nation [Korea] search for the next host nation.

●1694年、鬱陵島問題の時には、『東国輿地勝覧』に書かれた言葉は「朝鮮本土から見た鬱稜島である」と主張した。1950年以降、韓国は同じ部分を「鬱稜島から見た竹島」と主張した。自己矛盾している。 ●Ulleungdo-event 1694, Korea insisted "Ulleungdo is Korea" use the word written in 『東国輿地勝覧』 words "It is [Ulleungdo] that had been seen from a Korean mainland"but,,, After 1950, Korea insisted "[Takeshima] that had been seen from [Ulleungdo]" on the SAME part. It self-contradicts.

>>>>>Korea" target="_blank">http://temple.iza.ne.jp/images/user/20080710/293974.jpg

http://www.temple.iza.ne.jp/images/user/20080710/293974.jpg

F-22入荷予定

(=ﾟωﾟ)ﾉ

竹島の領有権に関する我が国（日本国）の一貫した立場

竹島は、歴史的事実に照らしても、かつ国際法上も明らかに我が国固有の領土です。 韓国による竹島の占拠は、国際法上何ら根拠がないまま行われている不法占拠であり、韓国がこのような不法占拠に基づいて竹島に対して行ういかなる措置も法的な正当性を有するものではありません。 ※韓国側からは、我が国が竹島を実効的に支配し、領有権を確立した以前に、韓国が同島を実効的に支配していたことを示す明確な根拠は提示されていません。

http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/takeshima/index.html ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ Japan's Inalterable Position on the Sovereignty of Takeshima In the light of historical facts and based upon international law, it is apparent that Takeshima is an inherent part of the territory of Japan. The occupation of Takeshima by the Republic of Korea is an illegal occupation undertaken on absolutely no basis in international law. Any measures taken with regard to Takeshima by the Republic of Korea based on such an illegal occupation have no legal justification. (Note: The Republic of Korea has yet to demonstrate a clear basis for its claims that, prior to Japan's effective control over Takeshima and establishment of sovereignty, the Republic of Korea had previously demonstrated effective control over Takeshima.) http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/index.html

What do he want to tell?

Japan has no historical ground for Dokdo. Japan must return all the Korean territory after the War with Treaty of Peace.

Just listing not related, even not reliable.

Should we answer for that?